Trusted on projects delivered by
Morgan Sindall
AtkinsRealis
Network Rail
SPL
Seimens
Drax
Cadelar
Alstom
East West Rail
Colas
VolkerRail
Volkerfitzpatrick
The problem

Too many systems. Not enough control.

Planning sits in one system. Requirements in spreadsheets. Documents in a CDE. Site data in field tools. Nothing connects—so teams rely on trackers, workarounds and guesswork to manage delivery. What's defined at the start rarely connects to what's delivered at the end.
Disconnected tools
Planning, requirements, documents and site activity live in separate systems.
No link between requirements and delivery
What was defined isn't clearly tied to what's actually been delivered.
Manual tracking and workarounds
Spreadsheets and trackers try to fill the gaps, but are often incomplete or out of date.
Handover risk
Critical information is missing, inconsistent or hard to verify at the point it matters most.
What's missing

What's missing isn't more tools. It's structure. Consistency. And a clear link between what's defined, what's delivered, and what's handed over.

Standards like ISO19650 define what good looks like—but delivering that in practice is where projects struggle. eviFile solves the hard part—connecting requirements, delivery and evidence into a single, structured system.
How it works

A golden thread across the project life cycle.

eviFile connects requirements, delivery and evidence, ensuring nothing is lost between definition, execution and handover.
Outcomes

Measurable ROI from week one.

£
2.4
M

Saved through reduced rework

70
%

Reduction in admin time

10
×

Faster validation

99.9
%

Data accuracy athandover

Ready to define it, control it and see it?